Select two historical leaders. One who was known for making a positive contribution in a leadership role, and the other who made a negative contribution in a leadership role (one good leader and one bad leader). For my Good leader I would to do it on Business man Richard Branson.
• He is a British business magnate, investor, author and philanthropist. He founded the Virgin Group, which controls more than 400 companies. • On 15 May 2014, Branson received the 2014 Business for Peace Award, awarded annually by the Business for Peace Foundation (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.in Oslo, Norway. • On 21 September 2014, Branson was recognized by The Sunday Times as the most admired business person over the last five decades. For my Bad leader I would like to write about Thaksin Shinawatra is a Thai (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and Montenegrin (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. businessman, politician and visiting professor. • Thaksin was accused of “policy corruption”, such as infrastructure and liberalization policies that, while legal and a potential benefit to society, also aided companies that were owned by his family members. • Transparency International reported that Thailand’s reputation for transparency among business executives improved somewhat during the years of the Thaksin government. • Thaksin’s government was accused of exerting political influence in its crackdown on unlicensed community radio stations, and Thaksin brought massive defamation suits against critical journalists. -Provide three separate reasons (with referenced examples) to justify the reason they were a good, or bad leader. -Identify, compare, and contrast the two different leadership styles of each one. Be sure to add applicable leadership theories and concepts.
THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR WRITERS
Order your custom answer